Études quantitatives des réactions radiochimiques III - Oxydation du sulfate ferreux par les particules β
J. Chim. Phys., 52 (1955) 578-586
Published online: 2017-05-29
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
A review of simulation codes and approaches for radiation chemistry
Ianik PlantePhysics in Medicine & Biology 66 (3) 03TR02 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abbd19
References
R. D. H. Chu, W. L. McLaughlin, A. Miller and P. H. G. SharpeJournal of the ICRU 8 (2) 81 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndn030
References
R. D. H. Chu, W. L. McLaughlin, A. Miller and P. H. G. SharpeJournal of the ICRU 8 (2) 81 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_ndn030
Monte Carlo simulation study of the effects of acidity and LET on the primary free-radical and molecular yields of water radiolysis — Application to the Fricke dosimeter
Narongchai Autsavapromporn, Jintana Meesungnoen, Ianik Plante and Jean-Paul Jay-GerinCanadian Journal of Chemistry 85 (3) 214 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1139/v07-021
Monte Carlo Calculation of the Primary Radical and Molecular Yields of Liquid Water Radiolysis in the Linear Energy Transfer Range 0.3–6.5 keV/μm: Application to137Cs Gamma Rays1
Jintana Meesungnoen, Mustapha Benrahmoune, Abdelali Filali-Mouhim, Samlee Mankhetkorn and Jean-Paul Jay-GerinRadiation Research 155 (2) 269 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0269:MCCOTP]2.0.CO;2
Fricke dosimetry: the difference betweenG(Fe3+) for60Co gamma-rays and high-energy x-rays
N V Klassen, K R Shortt, J Seuntjens and C K RossPhysics in Medicine and Biology 44 (7) 1609 (1999)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/303
Aus der Praxis der Ferrosulfat-(Fricke-)Dosimetrie
W. KochIsotopenpraxis Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 6 (10) 337 (1970)
https://doi.org/10.1080/10256017008622612
A ferrous sulphate dosemeter independent of photon energy in the range from 25 keV up to 50 MeV
D FrankenbergPhysics in Medicine & Biology 14 (4) 597 (1969)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/14/4/002
CHEMICAL DOSIMETRY FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF HIGH‐ENERGY PHOTONS AND ELECTRONS*
Robert J. Shalek and Charles E. SmithAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences 161 (1) 44 (1969)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb34040.x
Design and performance characteristics of an X-ray target for electron accelerators
T.J. Hardwick and W.S. GuentnerThe International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 12 (1-2) 20 (1961)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(61)90027-8
Atomic Radiation and Polymers
A. CHARLESBYAtomic Radiation and Polymers 182 (1960)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4831-9776-0.50016-4
Chemische Wirkungen ionisierender Strahlen 1. Einführung: Kernstrahlen‐Chemie einiger Gase und wäßriger Lösungen
Arnim HengleinAngewandte Chemie 71 (1) 15 (1959)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.19590710104
X- and γ Irradiation of Ferrous Sulfate in Dilute Aqueous Solution
J. L. Haybittle, R. D. Saunders and A. J. SwallowThe Journal of Chemical Physics 25 (6) 1213 (1956)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1743182
Yield of the Ferrous Sulfate Radiation Dosimeter: An Improved Cathode-Ray Determination
Robert H. Schuler and Augustine O. AllenThe Journal of Chemical Physics 24 (1) 56 (1956)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1700854